Exploring the Political Themes in Jurassic Park
Written on
The Personal Connection to Jurassic Park
Jurassic Park is a film that resonates deeply with me. I've revisited it numerous times, and while my initial experience as a child left me too terrified to finish, I've since come to recognize its brilliance. This film also holds sentimental value in my life, as it's my fiancée's favorite, and one of our first shared movie experiences. She often says that she realized she wanted to marry me while we watched it together, finishing each other's lines.
Although the book typically outshines its film adaptations, I will concentrate on the cinematic version here. At first glance, Jurassic Park may seem an odd choice for a discussion on political themes, as it doesn’t explicitly address politics. However, as readers of my previous writings might note, my definition of politics is broad. At its core, politics involves how individuals coexist and strive for collective goals that surpass mere personal interests. This perspective allows us to view Jurassic Park through a political lens.
In particular, the film prompts significant political and societal inquiries that critique contemporary life. I will explore three main themes: the relationship between science and technology, the influence of profit motives, and humanity's desire to dominate nature.
The Intersection of Science and Technology
Jurassic Park vividly illustrates the complex relationship between humanity and technology. As a science fiction narrative, it presents an extreme scenario that encourages us to consider the implications of a particular trend: genetic manipulation.
Our ability to decode and alter DNA is a remarkable scientific advancement, promising benefits such as developing more resilient crops and treating diseases. However, cautionary tales like Jurassic Park remind us that human creativity can lead to unforeseen and unethical applications of this knowledge.
John Hammond, the film's version of the park's creator, is portrayed as a blend of idealist and eccentric, suggesting we resurrect ancient species for an amusement park. While he has admirable intentions—like fostering humility in the face of human ingenuity—his profit-driven motives complicate the narrative. The film warns us that tools are not inherently neutral; they shape our objectives and methods.
Dr. Ian Malcolm's famous line, "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could that they didn't stop to think if they should," encapsulates this idea. Once the potential for genetic manipulation is unleashed, it can lead to a race among various stakeholders to exploit the technology, often without sufficient ethical consideration.
The Consequences of Profit Motives
If Malcolm is right, the downfall of Jurassic Park was inevitable. The catalyst for disaster, however, is corporate greed represented by Dennis Nedry, a contractor facing financial struggles. When Hammond declines Nedry's request for more funds, Nedry feels justified in sabotaging the park in collaboration with Lewis Dodgson, a rival executive seeking to steal dinosaur embryos.
Nedry’s actions lead to chaos, culminating in his own demise at the hands of a dinosaur he unleashed. While it’s easy to blame the park's collapse on Nedry and Dodgson, the reality is more nuanced. Unlike his book counterpart, film Hammond is an idealist who does not prioritize profit, yet he remains a businessman beholden to investors eager for returns. Their concerns about safety lead to the pivotal journey to Isla Nublar.
This intricate interplay reveals how profit motives can drive events in Jurassic Park, making the film a cautionary tale not only about science but also about the implications of profit-driven technological advancement.
Mastery Over Nature: A Philosophical Critique
René Descartes, a significant philosophical figure, argued that the essence of philosophy lies in developing technology to master nature. His views resonate with Sir Francis Bacon's philosophy, which advocates for using science to impose human will over nature. This mindset is evident in Jurassic Park, where the word "control" frequently recurs in dialogue.
Hammond repeatedly insists that the dinosaurs are under control, aided by extensive safeguards. However, Malcolm argues that such control is ultimately an illusion, one that chaos will inevitably shatter. When the T. rex escapes, Malcolm’s grim satisfaction at being correct serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of overconfidence in humanity's ability to master nature.
As the plot unfolds, the characters grapple with the chaos unleashed by their attempts at control. Ultimately, the film illustrates the dangers of humanity's hubris in believing it can fully dominate nature, which is inherently complex and unpredictable.
Conclusion: The Political Implications
Jurassic Park may not be overtly political, but it raises essential questions about how society navigates technological advancements and profit motives. Politics fundamentally concerns how individuals coexist and pursue collective goods. As modern humans, we possess remarkable tools to improve our world, yet these tools are not neutral. Once developed, they shape our understanding and approach to problems.
This presents a paradox: resolving technological challenges often requires further technological solutions, akin to trying to extinguish a fire with more fire. While this can work under certain conditions, it risks creating a self-perpetuating cycle of technological frenzy that can yield both positive and negative outcomes.
Ultimately, the film suggests that our advanced tools must be used judiciously. Jurassic Park serves as a stark reminder that the blend of technology, a misguided sense of control, and profit-seeking can lead to disastrous outcomes. However, it also implies that the tragedy on Isla Nublar was not inevitable; with careful deliberation, we can guide the use of our technological capabilities.
These themes underscore the need for collective decision-making regarding technology's role in society, profit motives, and ethical considerations. The failure to address these issues can lead to a scenario where tools dominate human life, with dire consequences.
If you found this exploration engaging and wish to see more content like it, along with deeper insights into my travels and other topics, I invite you to follow my work! Your support helps my writing reach a broader audience and fosters further stories.