The Fascinating Relationship Between Macroscopic and Microscopic Physics
Written on
Understanding the Scale Puzzle in Physics
Throughout history, since the time of Galileo, our understanding of the universe has largely been successful. By "successful," I mean that we have developed theories that have consistently produced accurate predictions and experimental confirmations. Many of our concepts regarding larger objects have proven effective even to this day. Although these theories may not fully explain the peculiarities of atomic behavior, the principles established during the 19th century remain relevant. For instance, Newton's laws of motion are still in use today, as are Maxwell's equations for electromagnetism. Classical mechanics continues to play a crucial role in engineering, from fluid dynamics to the construction of bridges.
Interestingly, the primary aim of contemporary physics is to address extreme conditions that don't typically affect our daily experiences. For example, we remain uncertain about the fundamental components of protons and neutrons at the smallest scales. Most physicists would agree that the last century has raised more questions than it has answered regarding the nature of matter. Consequently, this has led to a plethora of mathematical models and physical theories aimed at clarifying strange phenomena encountered at high energy levels, such as unusual magnetic spins in particles.
This situation raises an intriguing question: if we lack a clear understanding of what happens at the microscopic level, why are we able to construct theories that effectively describe larger, more significant phenomena? It seems perplexing that we can overlook the details happening at atomic or subatomic scales yet still expect the universe to adhere to coherent physical laws. As noted in David Skinner's exceptional lecture notes on quantum field theory, a glass of water serves as an illustrative example — we don't need to comprehend the intricate interactions of each water molecule to predict the dynamics of river flows.
The first video, "Taming Infinity," explores how concepts in physics can simplify complex phenomena without delving into every detail.
The Challenge of Infinities in Physics
The discussion surrounding scale leads to another perplexing issue: the appearance of 'infinities' in physical theories. To illustrate this, let's consider a basic physical system: a closed, empty box within a field. The mathematics suggests that the energies within this space can become infinite.
In physics, a field is a function that assigns values at specific points in space and time. For instance, I can visualize the temperature in my room at various locations. Quantum field theory examines how these fields can be represented as particles and vice versa. For our example, think of the area as an abstract mathematical construct utilized to develop physical predictions.
Inside this empty box, the scalar field oscillates like a spring, with frequencies that increase as integer multiples of a base frequency. There’s nothing inherently special about any specific frequency in this scenario. When we sum these frequencies to determine total energy, we encounter an infinite result. However, we know that infinite quantities are not measurable, leading us to question where the error lies.
In reality, the concept of a perfectly sealed box is flawed. Any box we construct is influenced by the materials from which it is made. Consequently, the ‘energy’ derived from this scenario is not physical or measurable. If it were, sealing a box would lead to catastrophic consequences, known as the ultraviolet catastrophe.
The underlying issue is that the infinite energy calculated must be seen as mathematical abstraction, serving primarily to facilitate the computation of finite, physical quantities in subsequent calculations.
Why the Mathematical Model Fails
If we assume the box is made of solid material, it would contain all possible frequency modes, resulting in infinite energy. However, we have neglected crucial aspects of physics in this model. A truly sealed box cannot exist, as it must be composed of atoms. Therefore, the high-frequency modes from the vacuum will inevitably escape through the walls.
This assumption is critical — it is reasonable to propose that physical models inherently experience some degree of leakage concerning higher frequency waves. By adopting this perspective, we might reach a more plausible conclusion if we impose a cutoff on the frequencies allowed to persist.
Interestingly, if we limit the frequencies within the box to a maximum cutoff, Lambda, we can express the energy within the box as follows:
In this context, the box's energy depends on both the cutoff level (in the first term) and its size (in the second term). Remarkably, the force derived from this energy—obtained by differentiating the energy concerning the box's length—remains independent of the frequency cutoff. Thus, we discover a quantum mechanical force from a seemingly dubious calculation, leading us to establish an arbitrary number, Lambda, to restrict frequencies.
This force, known as the Casimir force, is indeed observable and was experimentally confirmed by Lamoreaux in 1997. In his landmark paper, Casimir demonstrated that the method used to exclude higher frequency modes does not significantly affect the resulting force under most conditions, provided some form of cutoff is implemented.
The Casimir force exemplifies the separation between small-scale and large-scale physics. The micro-interactions of high-energy frequency modes with the walls are initially excluded from the long-distance macro-physics, ultimately leading us to conclude that they were never significant in the first place. This framework supports the central theme of this article: large-scale physics operates independently of small-scale phenomena.
The Concept of Renormalization
The decoupling of long and short wavelength physics is a remarkable conclusion. Initially, we sought to compute an observable quantity, necessitating the management of infinity through a cutoff. We then derived a physical value by differentiation to obtain a force. This method, which allows for physical predictions about macroscopic phenomena through an intermediate step of cutting off short-distance physics, is known as renormalization.
In summary, I hope to have conveyed how the Casimir effect serves as a minimal example illustrating the independence of macroscopic physics from microscopic phenomena. Renormalization is a foundational aspect of modern physics, with significant contributions from Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga in addressing infinities in quantum electrodynamics.
The second video, "Martin Hairer Colloquium Talk: Taming Infinities," provides further insights into the challenges and methodologies in modern physics regarding infinities.
References
[1] Hendrik Casimir, On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates. (reprint from Proceedings 51, (1948), 793–795)