# Is Food Packaging a Risk Factor for Autism in Children?
Written on
Understanding the BPA Controversy
Bisphenol A (BPA) has long been a topic of concern among health professionals and parents alike. This common chemical is utilized in the production of various plastic containers, including some used for food storage. Over the years, numerous studies have raised alarms about potential adverse health effects, primarily due to the possibility of BPA leaching into food and subsequently entering the human body.
Recently, a study has circulated claiming that boys exposed to BPA may have a sixfold increased risk of developing autism. This alarming headline has understandably sparked fear among parents, who worry that everyday items like snack containers and water bottles might be endangering their children’s health.
However, the actual findings of the study are far more intricate than the sensationalized headlines suggest. While the research is intriguing and methodologically sound, it does not definitively establish a causal relationship between BPA and autism, and if it does, it pertains only to a very select subgroup of individuals.
The Scientific Exploration
The study in question is a compilation of 25 experiments analyzing the potential link between BPA and autism. Although summarizing these experiments is challenging, several key points emerge:
- The research revealed a correlation between elevated BPA exposure and autism in a specific group of boys. This subgroup exhibited a genetic profile resulting in reduced levels of an enzyme known as aromatase, which influences hormone activity in the brain and may be associated with autism.
- Further experiments involved human cells in petri dishes, where BPA exposure was shown to diminish aromatase expression.
- Mouse studies indicated that BPA exposure during pregnancy led to a decrease in the number of brain cells producing aromatase in male offspring. Additionally, male mice whose mothers had been exposed to BPA displayed altered social behaviors, particularly in those with a genetic predisposition to low aromatase levels.
- The researchers also identified a potential mechanism linking BPA to brain cell activity, possibly mediated by a compound called 10HDA. When high doses of this chemical were administered to BPA-exposed mice, some behavioral differences diminished.
Caveats in the Research
Despite these findings, several significant caveats warrant consideration:
- The associations identified in the study are confined to a narrow demographic. The human research focused on a group of 605 children whose mothers were tested for BPA exposure during pregnancy. Notably, no correlation was found between BPA exposure and autism symptoms at age two or diagnoses at age nine across the entire population. The only notable association involved boys with low aromatase levels who had high BPA exposure.
- Even though this relationship was statistically significant, the authors lacked sufficient data to thoroughly analyze it. They approached confounding variables in isolation rather than employing a comprehensive model, and many were simplified into binary categories, limiting the interpretability of the results.
- Regarding the mouse studies, the BPA exposure levels were considerably high, with pregnant mice receiving a dose of 50 micrograms per kilogram via injection. This figure represents the maximum legally permissible BPA exposure in Europe during the mid-2000s, a level much higher than typical human exposure, which is estimated to be around 50 times lower.
- Furthermore, the method of BPA administration in mice (injection) significantly differs from how humans typically encounter the chemical (orally), which affects the amount of BPA that enters the bloodstream.
- Lastly, while some behavioral differences were noted in the BPA-exposed mice, there was still considerable overlap with the control group, complicating the interpretation of the results in relation to human autism.
Bottom Line
The research presents an interesting and relatively rigorous exploration of the potential connections between BPA and autism, particularly concerning specific genetic factors. Nonetheless, the existing data remains limited, and the associations observed are weak and applicable only to a small subset of children.
Even if it is confirmed that BPA can lead to autism in certain boys, the affected population would be quite small. Therefore, while the possibility of BPA being a contributing factor exists, as noted by Dr. Ian Musgrave from the University of Adelaide, the evidence is "less than compelling."
For those concerned about BPA exposure, it may be prudent to focus on minimizing contact with plastic packaging, especially items intended for heating, and opt for BPA-free products when available.
